Diversity Is Not Our Strength, Unity Is
Americans are often told that our diversity is our strength. The phrase rolls easily off the tongue, used by politicians, CEOs, and media pundits alike. It sounds noble, even poetic. But slogans can be deceptive when stripped of substance. Diversity alone, without a shared moral compass or national identity, is not a strength; it is a recipe for confusion, conflict, and ultimately, chaos.
The truth is simple: diversity can only be a blessing when it is harnessed toward a common good. Diversity in isolation is fragmentation. Diversity without unity is entropy. The Founders understood this well, which is why our national motto reads, E Pluribus Unum, “Out of many, one.” The “many” describes our differences, but the “one” defines our destiny.
The Confusion of a Virtue Untethered
The modern obsession with “diversity” has transformed it from a descriptive reality into a moral virtue. But in doing so, we have lost the very framework that allows diverse people to coexist meaningfully.
Today, diversity is often presented as an end in itself, a standalone good, requiring no justification and demanding no accountability. But let us ask a simple question: Why is diversity good?
Is it good because it guarantees better outcomes? Not necessarily. Is it good because it inherently fosters harmony? History would suggest otherwise. Is it good because it allows differing perspectives to refine truth? Yes, but only when there is agreement that truth exists and is worth seeking.
Without that common goal, diversity becomes a battlefield of competing interests, each shouting louder for recognition, each demanding validation without obligation. Diversity untethered from unity is not a mosaic; it is a minefield.
The Founders Understood the Balance
When America was founded, the people who gathered to forge a new nation were profoundly diverse, not in skin color perhaps, but in ideology, region, class, and religious conviction. Yet, they found strength not in their differences, but in their shared belief that liberty, under God, was worth uniting for.
They did not worship diversity; they harnessed it. The differences among the colonies, agricultural vs. industrial, Puritan vs. Anglican, urban vs. rural, could have torn the young nation apart. But a unifying vision, a creed that declared all men were created equal, endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, gave birth to a republic capable of transcending those divides.
The Founders did not say, “From many, many.” They said, E Pluribus Unum. Out of many, one. They understood that pluralism is sustainable only when it orbits a central truth.
The Lie of the Modern Age
Modern multiculturalism preaches a gospel of fragmentation. It tells us to celebrate every difference as if the mere act of being different is inherently good. It tells us that all beliefs are equally valid, all cultures equally moral, all truths equally true. But this is moral nonsense.
When every path is equally valid, there is no path at all, only wandering. When every flag flies with equal honor, no one flag inspires loyalty. When every idea is treated as sacred, truth becomes optional. And when truth becomes optional, freedom becomes impossible.
Our diversity has become a shield behind which we hide from responsibility. We excuse disorder as “expression.” We call division “representation.” We confuse inclusion with indulgence. And in doing so, we have forgotten the lesson of history: no civilization can survive long when its citizens cease to believe in a shared moral order.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Willful Positivity to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.